WebApr 21, 2010 · In the appeal filed against this judgment in R. Chitralekha & H. Anr. v State of Mysore & Ors [196416 SCR 368 the Supreme Court explained the inconsistency between the High Court judgment with the decision in Balaji’s case and observed that “Two principles stand out prominently from 355 Balaji, namely, (i) the caste of a group of citizens may be … WebApr 25, 2024 · R. Chitralekha v State of Mysore, AIR 1964 SC 1823. Link - 53. P. Rajendran Vs. State of Madras & Ors, 1968 SCR (2) 786. Link - 54. P. Sagar And Ors. vs State Of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1968 AP 165. Link - 55. Kumari K.S. Jayasree And Anr. vs The State Of Kerala And Anr, AIR 1976 SC 238. Link - 56. T. Devadasan v. Union of India, AIR 1964 SC 179 ...
Dr. Ambesh Kumar Etc. Etc vs Principal, Llrm Medical ... on 19 …
WebAug 8, 2014 · Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for ... R. Chitralekha v. State Of Mysore. 3. Court: Supreme Court Of ... Extra curricular activities including sports, social...possible to hold that if a State Legislature made a law prescribing a higher percentage of marks for extra-curricular activities in the ... WebDec 10, 2024 · R. Chitralekha v. State of Mysore & Ors, 1964 AIR 1823 [17] He is also credited to have presided over the first All India Conference of the Depressed Classes at Nagpur in the year 1920 where Dr. B. R. Ambedkar was among the main speakers and where it was resolved, among other things, to have true representatives of the depressed … literal versus abstract
R. Chitralekha: Venkatesubba Reddy VS State Of Mysore
WebCITATION: 1976 AIR 2482 1977 SCR (1) 323 1976 SCC (4) 153 ACT: Karnataka Recruitment of Gazetted Probationers (Class I and II ... R. Chitralekha and Anr. v. State of Mysore & … WebAug 11, 2024 · By Navya Yadav[1] In Supreme Court of India NAME OF THE CASE State of Uttar Pradesh v. Pradip Tandon & Others CITATION 1975 AIR 563, 1975 SCR (2) 761 … WebJun 12, 2008 · This Court in M. R. Balaji & others v. State of ‘Mysore(1) held that the order passed by the State of Mysore “was a fraud on the constitutional power conferred on the State by Art. 15(4)” and was liable to be quashed, because the order categorised, contrary to the plain intendment of Art. 15(4), the backward classes on the sole basis of ... literal vampire potbelly goblins